[Arm-allstar-irlp] Experimental Reflectors

Richard Hyde kyserver at gmail.com
Sun Apr 15 19:46:34 EST 2018


I just installed and that's what mine is doing also... Here is my log
file.....

Sun Apr 15 20:39:48 EDT 2018 [connect_to_reflector] Reflector ref905/Ch-0
CODEC chosen is UNCOMP.
Sun Apr 15 20:40:04 EDT 2018 [failure] timeout connect
Sun Apr 15 20:40:04 EDT 2018 [irlp_reset] Reset completed.

When I do this.....
asterisk -rx "rpt fun 43243 *389050"


Any help?  Thanks


            * Richard Hyde*

*                KE4GJG <http://www.ke4gjg.com>*

*           London, KY 40741*


On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 5:27 PM, David McGough <kb4fxc at inttek.net> wrote:

>
> Here is an update to my earlier message....Appearently even the
> old/original ACID AllStar/chan_irlp systems have problems with
> experimental reflectors.
>
> Paul (KN2R) and I did some analysis tonight and more will be happening
> shortly. Greg reported an that when a normal station node (stnXXXX) tries
> to connect to an experimental reflector, only the first 3 digits of the
> node number seem to get through. I confirmed that when I try to connect
> from my test station: stn3787, it shows up on the experimental reflector
> only as: 378....Hum. Strange.  I'm wondering if there is a protocol bug
> in the chan_irlp code...I'm investigating.
>
> 73, David KB4FXC
>
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, David McGough wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > We're confirmed that connecting to experimental reflectors seems to
> fail.
> > Previously, I thought that I COULD successfully connect, however, I now
> > think this wasn't the case.
> >
> > ...So, the next question: Has AllStar/chan_irlp *EVER* been able to
> > connect to experimental reflectors??? ---even the original code, running
> > on old ACID servers??
> >
> > 73, David KB4FXC
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, Doug Crompton wrote:
> >
> > > It seems some can connect and others cannot. Keep in mind that
> experimental
> > > nodes have a different database that may only be updated daily and not
> all
> > > entries may be accurate or online. It is important for you to leave you
> > > node on for node updates.
> > >
> > > For those having problem with experimental nodes please give us the
> node
> > > numbers you are NOT having success with so we can test.
> > >
> > >
> > > *73 Doug*
> > >
> > > *WA3DSP*
> > >
> > > *http://www.crompton.com/hamradio <http://www.crompton.com/hamradio>*
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:32 AM, randy thomas <k8khw at att.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Doug
> > > > When I call the Experlmental Reflector
> > > > I notice on my Experimental Reflector
> > > > Log it shows stn812 not the full irlp
> > > > node number then allstar disconnects
> > > > So it goes like this I call the
> > > > Experimental Node allstar says 80072 link active the connection
> shows up
> > > > on my Experimental Reflector status page as stn812
> > > > Then after maybe 5 seconds Allstar
> > > > Disconnects and says the connection
> > > > Failed
> > > > Randy
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 15, 2018, at 4:30 AM, randy thomas <k8khw at att.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Doug
> > > > We still can not connect to most Experimental Reflectors Its really
> > > > strange when you call the experimental Reflector I get the voice
> > > > saying Number 80072 link Active then
> > > > in a few seconds It will say 80072
> > > > connection failed It seems to work
> > > > fine on all regular Nodes and Reflectors
> > > >   Randy K8khw
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 14, 2018, at 11:36 PM, Doug Crompton <wa3dsp at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have not heard any talk about this lately but early on people were
> > > > having problems with experimental reflectors. Is this still the
> case? Has
> > > > anything been resolved on this. We have tested this and we are able
> to
> > > > connect to anything we tried.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *73 Doug*
> > > >
> > > > *WA3DSP*
> > > >
> > > > *http://www.crompton.com/hamradio <http://www.crompton.com/hamradio
> >*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Arm-allstar-irlp mailing list
> > > > Arm-allstar-irlp at hamvoip.org
> > > > http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar-irlp
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Arm-allstar-irlp mailing list
> > > > Arm-allstar-irlp at hamvoip.org
> > > > http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar-irlp
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Arm-allstar-irlp mailing list
> > > > Arm-allstar-irlp at hamvoip.org
> > > > http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar-irlp
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arm-allstar-irlp mailing list
> > Arm-allstar-irlp at hamvoip.org
> > http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar-irlp
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-allstar-irlp mailing list
> Arm-allstar-irlp at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar-irlp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hamvoip.org/pipermail/arm-allstar-irlp/attachments/20180415/dd868e98/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Arm-allstar-irlp mailing list