[arm-allstar] Anyone doing G.722?

[Justin Reed]

David
How does G.729 transcode compared to ilbc in respect to CPU load?

Justin
NV8Q

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 24, 2017, at 12:48 PM, David McGough via arm-allstar <arm-allstar at hamvoip.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> As you noticed, I added the G.722 and G.729 CODECs in the most recent
> release. G.722 was added mainly for compatibility Cisco phones running the
> sccp protocol. For AllStar use, G.722 won't really get you anything over
> ulaw (G.711). AllStar audio is hard limited to (less than) 4KHz by code in
> the channel drivers, etc.
> 
> BTW, G.729 works quite well and uses slightly less bandwidth than iLBC.
> 
> 
> 73, David KB4FXC
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, "Stephen - K1LNX via arm-allstar" wrote:
>> 
>> With the recent release of G.722 into the HamVOIP image, I'd like to give
>> it a try. I use G.722 on my normal Asterisk endpoints, and the audio
>> quality has always been fantastic.
>> 
>> Anyone with a public node using this yet?
>> 
>> 73
>> Stephen
>> K1LNX
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> arm-allstar mailing list
>> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
>> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>> 
>> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> arm-allstar mailing list
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
> 
> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org