[arm-allstar] Anyone doing G.722?
David McGough
kb4fxc at inttek.net
Tue Oct 24 12:48:21 EST 2017
Hi Stephen,
As you noticed, I added the G.722 and G.729 CODECs in the most recent
release. G.722 was added mainly for compatibility Cisco phones running the
sccp protocol. For AllStar use, G.722 won't really get you anything over
ulaw (G.711). AllStar audio is hard limited to (less than) 4KHz by code in
the channel drivers, etc.
BTW, G.729 works quite well and uses slightly less bandwidth than iLBC.
73, David KB4FXC
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, "Stephen - K1LNX via arm-allstar" wrote:
> With the recent release of G.722 into the HamVOIP image, I'd like to give
> it a try. I use G.722 on my normal Asterisk endpoints, and the audio
> quality has always been fantastic.
>
> Anyone with a public node using this yet?
>
> 73
> Stephen
> K1LNX
> _______________________________________________
>
> arm-allstar mailing list
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>
> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>
More information about the arm-allstar
mailing list