[arm-allstar] Ranger functions impact

[Michael Hebert]

​All nodes numbered below 2000 are considered private. ​

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:31 PM, David McGough <kb4fxc at inttek.net> wrote:

>
> Hi Cole,
>
> I always use Private node numbers that begin with the digit one ("1"),
> such as 1211, 1212, 1261, 1262, etc. Nodes starting with "1" are private
> and part of the standard AllStar configuration.
>
>
> 73, David KB4FXC
>
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Cole Cunningham wrote:
>
> > We're looking building controllers with eight BBB's in them and trying to
> > come up with a private node numbering scheme that makes it easy to
> maintain
> > and replicate the conf files.
> >
> >
> >
> > I found there are RANGER nodes and they all begin their node number with
> 9.
> >
> >
> >
> > What  would happen if we used a 9xxxx as a private node number?  It would
> > never be exposed to the Allstar system but would be used by operators in
> > linking.  And would never get the LiTZ.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know the answer?
> >
> >
> >
> > Cole, AA7RD
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > BTW, you guys are really a help in trying to get my arms around learning
> all
> > the nuances of Allstar code.  Thanks.  And when we get our 8 node BBB
> based
> > controller up and running we'll share our experiences and setup here.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> arm-allstar mailing list
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>
> Visit the BBB web page -
> http://www.crompton.com/hamradio/BeagleBoneBlackAllstar/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hamvoip.org/pipermail/arm-allstar/attachments/20150126/6020e187/attachment.html>