[arm-allstar] Asterisk internal latency
Steve L
kb9mwr at gmail.com
Thu Apr 28 21:49:23 EDT 2022
I'd venture to say a 1.40 thing. There were very noticeable timing
improvements in subsequent versions
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Timing+Interfaces
I remember when I was using Asterisk as a PBX to hairpin my pots line, and
the echo induced by timing latencies was much improved when I upgraded to
1.6
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022, 7:52 PM "Patrick Perdue via ARM-allstar" <
arm-allstar at hamvoip.org> wrote:
> If using Asterisk in full duplex mode, I.E. duplex=2, there is obviously
> an inherent delay. What I want to know, however, is why that delay is as
> high as it is. It seems to have nothing, or very little, to do with the
> OSS sound driver, as this delay is about the same with a local VoIP
> device as any of the attached radios using the SimpleUSB channel driver.
> It just strikes me as odd that I can use a program like Jamulus or
> Sonobus, and get a high quality, uncompressed stereo PCM or OPUS stream
> to and from myself across the Atlantic via UDP in quite a lot less time
> than I can hear myself coming from my own repeater with all the delays
> from the SimpleUSB channel driver at zero, when network latency isn't
> even a factor. Yes, I realize that I'm talking about pushing more data
> across in these cases, and these programs are specifically designed for
> near zero latency due to their very nature, but it's just interesting to
> me.
>
> Is this just the inherent behavior of the old Asterisk 1.4.x core, or is
> there something else going on here?
>
> A curious HamVoIP user:
>
> N2DYI
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> ARM-allstar mailing list
> ARM-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>
> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3/4 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>
More information about the ARM-allstar
mailing list