[arm-allstar] FW: Multiple nodes on a LAN

[Patrick Perdue]

My router has hairpin NAT enabled. I did some testing, and for purposes 
of Allstarlink/HamVoIP (I have a mix of both on my network), it 
basically just doesn't work. Static routes are, of course, fine.

Wow, 2029... I'm jealous of that low number.

On 2/14/2021 10:52 PM, "Rob Vella via ARM-allstar" wrote:
> I have at any time 3 or 4 nodes behind my NAT router. I went the static
> routes method in rpt.conf because for the life of me I can't get my router
> to properly route back into my network. It's a simple fix and if you don't
> move around your nodes much it's just a one time change. Here's my stanza
> in rpt.conf for node 2029:
>
> [nodes]
> 2029 = radio at 127.0.0.1:4570/2029,NONE
> 52083  = radio at 127.0.0.1/2029,NONE
> 2020 = radio at 10.0.1.13/2020,NONE
> 525070 = radio at 127.0.0.1/525070,NONE
>
> Node 2020 is basically the same but has the reverse:
>
> [nodes]
> 2029 = radio at 10.0.1.12:4570/2029,NONE
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
> KK9ROB
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 8:49 AM "Joe Borovetz via ARM-allstar" <
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org> wrote:
>
>> I have a unusual setup. The nodes are on a CradlePoint MBR-95 (I had
>> it). This is behind a Pace 5268 Uverse Gateway Router. Both are at my
>> house.
>>
>> The reason for the second router is this....the links to the repeaters
>> run on a 3 GHz network running on ham frequency allocations. It has been
>> up 6 years. I was trying to avoid any commercial traffic on the link and
>> add an extra layer of security. In addition to the Allstar nodes, there
>> are two P25 repeaters and a DMR repeater using this LAN.
>>
>> I did get it working by opening the UDP ports on the Uverse Gateway
>> although I would prefer to keep it on just the LAN.
>>
>> I am open to any thoughts on keeping it just on the "ham" LAN". I did
>> consider a router change for the second router.
>>
>> First thing to get it working, next solve the LAN issue. I have added
>> the correct entries in rpt.conf for each of the three nodes.
>>
>> Would adding static routes in the MBR-95 be a solution or would a router
>> change be better. I have not tried the static route method.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> On 2/12/2021 10:38 PM, "Bryan St Clair via ARM-allstar" wrote:
>>> Why would you not use the local LAN IP and avoid hairpin all together?
>>>
>>> What router do you have?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 8:23 PM "j.borovetz--- via ARM-allstar" <
>>> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have three nodes on the same LAN and am having problems with setting
>> up
>>>> hairpin loopback.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have followed the instructions for using multiple nodes on the same
>> LAN.
>>>> I
>>>> have looked over my entries in rpt.conf multiple times and it looks
>> like I
>>>> have entered the correct information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts as to what I might be overlooking.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> ARM-allstar mailing list
>>>> ARM-allstar at hamvoip.org
>>>> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>>>>
>>>> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3/4 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> ARM-allstar mailing list
>> ARM-allstar at hamvoip.org
>> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>>
>> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3/4 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
> ARM-allstar mailing list
> ARM-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>
> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3/4 web page - http://hamvoip.org