[arm-allstar] Rx On Delay Future Implementation

[Doug Crompton]

OK, But it still seems to me that you are using it to correct an issue that
should be solved another way. Having any COS delay over a second or so
would make for a very sluggish system.


*73 Doug*

*WA3DSP*

*http://www.crompton.com/hamradio <http://www.crompton.com/hamradio>*


On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:32 PM "Henry Hamblin via ARM-allstar" <
arm-allstar at hamvoip.org> wrote:

> Hi Doug,
>
> I agree that the 5 seconds would be an extreme case,
> and probably would be more like 3 to 3.5. But, the
> flexibility would be there if needed.
>
> Thanks,
> Henry
>
> ________________________________
> From: ARM-allstar <arm-allstar-bounces at hamvoip.org> on behalf of "Doug
> Crompton via ARM-allstar" <arm-allstar at hamvoip.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 3:10 PM
> To: ARM Allstar
> Cc: Doug Crompton
> Subject: Re: [arm-allstar] Rx On Delay Future Implementation
>
> Henry,
>
>  This could be easily done but I am not understanding the utility of having
> to wait 5 seconds to be able to talk.  That is an eternity and seems like
> it would cause more trouble then help. What system needs 5 seconds to
> propagate a keyup? It seems more like a system problem that should be
> corrected. So if someone keys up they have to wait 5 seconds to talk? You
> know that the majority of people will have 5 seconds of their audio cutoff
> if they don't do that and it totally precludes moderately fast back and
> forth discussions.
>
>
> *73 Doug*
>
> *WA3DSP*
>
> *http://www.crompton.com/hamradio <http://www.crompton.com/hamradio>*
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:05 PM "Henry Hamblin via ARM-allstar" <
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > As a multiple repeater system owner, I would like the ability to extend
> > the Rx On Delay beyond what the firmware currently allows, approx 2
> > seconds.  I realize that this is more than a sufficient amount for a vast
> > number
> > of nodes, but if your node is connected to a repeater or multiple
> > repeaters,
> > then you know some situations that the extra delay would be an asset.
> >
> > If the Max delay could be extended to 250, 5 seconds, that would be
> great.
> >
> > I am well aware of the drawbacks of an extended Rx on delay, but I feel
> > in some situations that repeater system operators experience, the delay
> > would outweigh the disadvantage.
> >
> > I really appreciate all of the time and effort that goes into the
> ham.voip
> > All Star image.  Great job by the ham.voip development team.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Henry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [
> https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png
> > ]<
> >
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > ARM-allstar mailing list
> > ARM-allstar at hamvoip.org
> > http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
> >
> > Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
>
> ARM-allstar mailing list
> ARM-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>
> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org
> _______________________________________________
>
> ARM-allstar mailing list
> ARM-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>
> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>