[arm-allstar] Easier way to effect HamVoip updates?
Don Backstrom - AA7AU
z-armallstar at deliberate.net
Wed Mar 7 14:18:43 EST 2018
On Wed 07-Mar-18 10:52, "Doug Crompton via arm-allstar" wrote:
> The whole idea of the updates as you know is so that one could update over
> the Internet and not have to image or re-image SD cards.
A great approach and certainly appreciated. I can't imagine trying to
*attempt* to drive up to the top of Baldy at 9000' in East Central Idaho
right now to change out a new updated MicroSD card - can't even get
there until mid-May at the earliest. (I do have to watch out for remote
menu option #16).
> We will be
> updating the static image at hamvoip.org soon and this will at least put
> new users close to the latest updates.
Great news.
I am *really* looking forward to your new DNS lookup approach and have
been promoting it in the several AllStar/HamVoip tech sessions I've done
in the recent past. Also, I understand it's not under your control but
do wonder if the <node>.asnode.org DDNS approach will be going away?
On a tech note: I wonder if it would make sense to hard-code a couple
of "hosts" entries in your new image for whichever domains you need
access to for first-time updates so that external DNS problems might be
avoided at least for the first time stuff. You could delete those "host"
entries as first-time finishes up or whatever. I know hard-coding is
generally a bad idea, but you could also first test those and then if
they fail have a look-around using your current DNS approach if they are
no longer current. Just a half-baked idea. More code but perhaps more
elegant?
> Dave and I have had this discussion many times. It has always been and I
> think will remain our idea to not force updates
Absolutely. Make it easy but not mandatory.
> I will talk to Dave and maybe we can come up with some
> ideas on how to make it more accessible and also still reliable.
Hope so. Thanks again,
- Don - AA7AU
More information about the arm-allstar
mailing list