[arm-allstar] arm-allstar Digest, Vol 40, Issue 27

[ku6v]

Doug thanks for the.I didn't specify the 41971 RPi2 V1.0.46532 is V1.5 Pi3.Is that problematic?

73Thanks Don 

-------- Original message --------
From: arm-allstar-request at hamvoip.org 
Date: 9/19/17  10:00 AM  (GMT-08:00) 
To: arm-allstar at hamvoip.org 
Subject: arm-allstar Digest, Vol 40, Issue 27 

Send arm-allstar mailing list submissions to
	arm-allstar at hamvoip.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	arm-allstar-request at hamvoip.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	arm-allstar-owner at hamvoip.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of arm-allstar digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. second node installed on same ip address (ku6v)
   2. Re: second node installed on same ip address (Doug Crompton)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:29:30 -0700
From: "ku6v" <ku6v at pacbell.net>
To: <arm-allstar at hamvoip.org>
Subject: [arm-allstar] second node installed on same ip address
Message-ID: <000c01d330bc$d643aa60$82caff20$@pacbell.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

I installed a second node on the same ip address with a different bind port.
I cannot get the second node to make or accept calls. It does show up as
being online and in green.

What did I do this time?  I did look at my working node 41971
extensions.conf for differences but did not see anything obvious. The second
node is 46532. 

 

73

Don

KU6V

 



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:26:37 -0400
From: Doug Crompton <wa3dsp at gmail.com>
To: ARM Allstar <arm-allstar at hamvoip.org>
Subject: Re: [arm-allstar] second node installed on same ip address
Message-ID:
	<CAMp6vsu+aGWxU3yM=HaZRqAo1=TtVsWkMrtMW9VGfpnzopF=_g at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Don,

  It looks like you did change the port at allstarlink.org for the second
node. Here is how they show up here -

41971=radio at 199.103.53.101:4569/41971,199.103.53.101

46532=radio at 199.103.53.101:4570/46532,199.103.53.101

In order to diagnose we need more info as it could be so many things. dtmf
not working? nodes not downloading? etc.

What does it do when you try to connect out to a valid node? If you go into
the client from the main menu you can see your dtmf being sent and the
response. Do you have a /tmp/rpt_extnodes file?

Remember unless your router has hairpin loopback you cannot connect the
nodes together without putting specific routing in rpt.conf to each other.
In that case see this howto at the hamvoip.org web page -

https://www.hamvoip.org/multi-server%20howto.pdf



*73 Doug*

*WA3DSP*

*http://www.crompton.com/hamradio <http://www.crompton.com/hamradio>*





On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:29 PM, "ku6v via arm-allstar" <
arm-allstar at hamvoip.org> wrote:

> I installed a second node on the same ip address with a different bind
> port.
> I cannot get the second node to make or accept calls. It does show up as
> being online and in green.
>
> What did I do this time?  I did look at my working node 41971
> extensions.conf for differences but did not see anything obvious. The
> second
> node is 46532.
>
>
>
> 73
>
> Don
>
> KU6V
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> arm-allstar mailing list
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>
> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>
>


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
arm-allstar mailing list
arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar


------------------------------

End of arm-allstar Digest, Vol 40, Issue 27
*******************************************