[arm-allstar] Anyone doing G.722?

[Stephen - K1LNX]

Ahh... ok thanks for the clarification David. Makes sense, but I was hoping
;)

73
Stephen
K1LNX

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:48 PM, David McGough <kb4fxc at inttek.net> wrote:

>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> As you noticed, I added the G.722 and G.729 CODECs in the most recent
> release. G.722 was added mainly for compatibility Cisco phones running the
> sccp protocol. For AllStar use, G.722 won't really get you anything over
> ulaw (G.711). AllStar audio is hard limited to (less than) 4KHz by code in
> the channel drivers, etc.
>
> BTW, G.729 works quite well and uses slightly less bandwidth than iLBC.
>
>
> 73, David KB4FXC
>
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, "Stephen - K1LNX via arm-allstar" wrote:
>
> > With the recent release of G.722 into the HamVOIP image, I'd like to give
> > it a try. I use G.722 on my normal Asterisk endpoints, and the audio
> > quality has always been fantastic.
> >
> > Anyone with a public node using this yet?
> >
> > 73
> > Stephen
> > K1LNX
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > arm-allstar mailing list
> > arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
> > http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
> >
> > Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org
> >
>
>