[arm-allstar] Echolink Conferences

dan at ozment.net dan at ozment.net
Tue Jun 13 11:20:39 EST 2017


No, they are at different locations.  The Allstar node and Echolink 
W4DTO-L is at our repeater location.  W4DTO-L is being managed by 
Allstar.  The other Echolink node, WB4QOJ-R, is offsite and is a stand 
alone Echolink node.  Plan # 1 was for users to connect to WB4QOJ-R 
remotely, and we use Allstar to link -L to -R.  That's the case where we 
aren't getting audio back from the RF side to -R.

The other thing we discussed was just shutting down W4DTO-L and defining 
the -R node on Allstar.  Users would connect directly to it.  But, I can 
see that we might over power the Pi if we go that route.

I'm stumped as to why the first method isn't working.  If I connect 
directliy to W4DTO-L with an Echolink client on the outside of that 
network I get two way audio.  So, I thing port forwrding is good there.  
Same thing is true of the -R node.  If we connect to it from a client al 
is good.  But, when I connect the two together I don't see to get audio 
routed all the way through.



On 2017-06-13 10:30, "Doug Crompton via arm-allstar" wrote:
> Dan,
> 
>  I don't have a good enough picture of what you are doing? When you say 
> -L
> and -R Echolink nodes are you saying they are both on the same public 
> IP
> address? That would not work. Give me a map of what Echolink is on what
> network?
> 
> I have an Echolink -L node connected to a separate node on my hub 
> server.
> That node is in turn connected to the hub on the same server. Echolink 
> port
> forwarding is to that server. I can connect and disconnet the Echolink 
> at
> will but just connecting/disconnecting the two Allstar nodes. I could 
> not
> have any other Echolink on my public IP even if it was on another 
> Allstar
> server unless I used a proxy.
> 
> 
> *73 Doug*
> 
> *WA3DSP*
> 
> *http://www.crompton.com/hamradio <http://www.crompton.com/hamradio>*
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:50 AM, "Dan Ozment via arm-allstar" <
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org> wrote:
> 
>> Still working with Echolink on my repeater connected node, and I
>> wondered if someone could give me some advice on a direction.
>> 
>> I set up Echolink on the node as a "-L" node with the default Echolink
>> configuration (no conference mode).  I was able to connect to Echolink
>> from my phone, and it works well with two way audio between Echolink 
>> and
>> the RF side.
>> 
>> My plan was to connect our public "-R" node to that one from an 
>> external
>> source and let our users come in on the "-R" node.  It connects up
>> great.  Audio from Echolink is sent out over the repeater, but we 
>> don't
>> get audio from the repeater back to the Echolink "-R" node.  Any
>> thoughts as to why that would happen?
>> 
>> Another idea was to run the "-R" node from the Pi that is hosting
>> Allstar.  I would need to allow conference mode and up to 20 users
>> (although 5 to 10 is more realistic).  I'm using one of the later
>> versions of the Pi 2.   Could it handle both?
>> 
>> When we tried putting the "-R" node on the Allstar Pi we had mixed
>> results keeping three users connected.  I wonder if I was just
>> overpowering the Pi.
>> 
>> I realize I'm not providing much configuration info here so that folks
>> can help me diagnose what's going on.  At this point I'm trying to
>> decide on the best approach to get our main Echolink node (WB4QOJ-R)
>> successfully operational through our main Allstar node.
>> 
>> Thanks for any input.
>> 
>> 73,
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> W4DTO
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> arm-allstar mailing list
>> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
>> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>> 
>> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> arm-allstar mailing list
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
> 
> Visit the BBB and RPi2/3 web page - http://hamvoip.org


More information about the arm-allstar mailing list