[arm-allstar] Using PL instead of COS
David McGough
kb4fxc at inttek.net
Fri May 13 09:37:16 EST 2016
Hi LaRoy,
Typically the PL decoders are slow to de-activate, compared to squelch.
So, yes, only using output from the PL decoder will likely leave you with
a very long squelch tail.
73, David KB4FXC
On Fri, 13 May 2016, LaRoy McCann via arm-allstar wrote:
> I'm interfacing a ge mastr exec II to raspberry pi. I have one I've
> done previously where I have both cos and pl inputs.
>
> I'm going to have to make a cos buffer interface to change the cos_high
> from the radio to cos_low for the controller which is no problem,
>
> We will always us PL on the input so I was wondering if I could just get
> by with using the TS64 PL signal for the cos input on the controller?
>
> Does anyone know of any reasons not to use only PL signal for cos?
>
> Would there be any longer squelch tail?
>
>
> LaRoy McCann, K5TW
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> arm-allstar mailing list
> arm-allstar at hamvoip.org
> http://lists.hamvoip.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-allstar
>
> Visit the BBB and RPi2 web page - http://hamvoip.org
>
More information about the arm-allstar
mailing list